||Main Project Members：Sadafumi Kawato（The University of Tokyo), Reiji Matsumoto (Waseda University), Aiji Tanaka (Waseda University), Yasushi Watanabe (Keio University), Hiroshi Okayama (Keio University), Kazuyuki Sugawara(Kushiro Public University of Economics), Masaru Nishikawa(Tsuda College ) Research Support Member：Tomoyuki Miyata (Research Associate, The University of Tokyo), Rentaro Iida(doctoral student, Georgetown University and the University of Tokyo), Ayako Hiramatsu(doctoral student, Johns Hopkins University and the University of Tokyo), Takeshi Umekawa(Research Associate, the University of Tokyo), Hana Ishikawa(doctoral student, the University of Tokyo), Ayako Sugino (doctoral student, the University of Tokyo), Kota Matsui(doctoral student, the University of Tokyo)
The ideological polarization is one of the most noteworthy features of contemporary American politics. Under the Obama Administration, no Republican House member voted for the stimulus package bill passed in February in 2009, or no Republican Senator voted for the health care reform bill passed in December of the same year.
At the same time, we should not ignore some of the real and sincere efforts to regain or pursue bipartisanship even in this hyper-partisan atmosphere, especially on such issues as foreign policy, fiscal policy, social security, or health care reform. Although there already exist plenty of studies that are critical of the polarized nature of American politics, we can find only a few researches on the measures, attempts or dialogues that try to overcome this tendency for ideological polarization or to construct a possible political base that might sustain such efforts. Bridging the Foreign Policy Divide coedited by Derek Chollet, Tod Lindberg, and David Shorr, is one of a few examples. Herein lie the significance and uniqueness of this project.
Especially on foreign policy, this research project is important, because President Obama himself assembled a bipartisan foreign policy team which is virtually a coalition of moderate Democrats and moderate/realists Republicans. We should analyze how this effort has worked in the first few years of the Obama Administration, for this will make a great case study for our project both in an academic and a policy relevant sense.
Although this research project is primarily an attempt to understand the most essential driving force of contemporary U.S. politics, we will also look at the current U.S. policy toward Japan in the same framework of partisanship and bipartisanship. This policy area is surprisingly bipartisan in nature, given the overall partisan tone of foreign policy debate in the U.S. As is illustrated by the two so-called Armitage-Nye Reports, there is a firm bipartisan support for the alliance with Japan in Washington. To be sure, there used to be some partisan edge when trade issues were at the forefront of the U.S.-Japan bilateral relations in the 1980s and early 1990s.
Partisanship could certainly play a role here, but there are many other factors influencing the way people view this issue. Wilsonians, realists, and isolationists would differ a lot on this. This research project will include the policy toward Japan as a part of the dynamics and reflections of ideology-ridden American politics.
As to the methodology, Kawato and Tanaka will employ numerical analysis, while Okayama and Watanabe will conduct interviews as well as institutional and historical study. Matsumoto will carry out a comparative study with Europe and Japan. While overseeing the project, Kubo will also implement research on US-Japan relations.